Arguments Against GMOs. Harvard Website Ben Miflin . FOR GMOs: AGAINST GMOs: 1. American RadioWorks is the national documentary unit of American Public Media. Some fear that it is possible that, by engaging in genetic alterations, unexpected negative changes could occur in these foods. A GMO stands for a Genetically Modified Organism. I am against genetically modified foods for many reasons, all of which relate to GM crops being bad for humans, farmers, animals, and the earth. While this relatively new technology is riddled with bioethics questions, the arguments for and against GMOs are difficult to weigh because it's hard to know what the risks are—until something goes wrong. A molecular geneticist examines popular claims. The use of heavy chemicals on crops means that the land will absorb the chemical residue. But then, the Proposition isn’t asking that GMO products be banned. If you're confused about the pros and cons of genetically modified organisms (GMOs), you're not alone. To keep pace, the United Nations say global food production will have to double over the next 35 years. Arguments against patenting GMO’s for use in the agribiotech sector usually come from either an anti-GMO camp, or from those who are fundamentally against the patent system. They cite animal studies showing organ damage, gastrointestinal and immune system disorders, accelerated aging, and infertility. Mankind has been manipulating the genetics of crops for around 10,000 years. GMOs are unhealthy. FAO Environment There is also concerns about the environment. Read what this geneticist says as she draws information from Monsanto’s own website and connects the dots regarding genetically engineered corn. Meanwhile, the arguments against GMOs continue to mount. If consumers are aware of the risks of GMOs, product demand will slip even further and people employed by the top GMO companies (Monsanto, DuPont, Bayer, Dow, … Genetically Modified Organism or GMO are organisms whose genes are altered by scientists so that they will become super organism fit for a specific […] ARW is public radio's largest documentary production unit; it creates documentaries, series projects, and investigative reports for the public radio system and the Internet. Well, that’s about to change. In trying to come up with an argument in favor of GMOs, here are the best two I can think of: 1.) By 2050, the world’s population is expected to expand from today’s 7 billion to way beyond 9 billion. Food supply It also provides information on the effects of GMO to the society. When discussing GMOs, many arguments are put forth on why they are “bad” and should be avoided. Why We Shouldn't Label GMO Foods. ARW is based at St. Paul, Minnesota, with staff journalists in Washington, D.C., Duluth, M.N., San Francisco, C.A., and Durham, N.C. The American Academy of Environmental Medicine (AAEM) urges doctors to prescribe non-GMO diets for all patients. Environment. Weeds that were killed will contain chemical residue, posing a threat to soils and living organisms in them. This is a cause and effect essay on the GMO topic. While there are many arguments made by anti-GMO organizations against the safety GMOs, science has concluded that these products are safe. From a science perspective, we don’t like pro-labeling or no-labeling laws because genetic engineering to produce GMOs is just another way of breeding — all breeding introduces genetic modifications. I’ve written about GMOs (genetically modified organisms) before, but usually in an information-sharing format that doesn’t push you to take one side or another. In a debate, which has so far generated over 2,000 studies, documenting that GMO technology does not pose an unusual threat to human health [3], and probably involves just as many people supporting the opposite idea, it is perhaps difficult to strip arguments back to the basic facts and get a fresh look at the issues..