The case of Atkins v. Virginia dealt with administrative law. The population was 1,143 at the 2010 census. It also concluded that there was little if any deterrent or retributive effect from executing such defendants. Atkins v. Virgina. Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002), is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled 6-3 that executing people with intellectual disabilities violates the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishments, but states can define who has an intellectual disability. The presiding jury over the original Atkins V. Virginia case sentenced Mr. Atkins to death. Atkins v. Virginia: In a landmark 6–3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court barred the execution of mentally retarded people, ruling that it constituted "cruel and unusual punishment" prohibited by the Eighth Amendment . Atkins v. Virginia. However, the Court left to the states to determine the definition of mental retardation. Other articles where Atkins v. Virginia is discussed: crime: Intention: …Court ruled in 2002, in Atkins v. Virginia, that a sentence of capital punishment for people with mental retardation was unconstitutional; however, such people can be sentenced to life in prison without parole. Facts. The jury accepted his friend’s testimony as truth and thought that Mr. Atkins was lying. The Case: Atkins V. Virginia . 00-8452 Atkins against Virginia will be announced by Justice Stevens. Atkins is a census-designated place (CDP) in Smyth County, Virginia, United States. Contents The practice of not acquitting those with mental impairments but mitigating their punishments is found in many… The Background of Atkins v. Virginia (2002) Daryl Renard Atkins and another individual were convicted of robbing and murdering an individual after abducting him; shortly after the robbery, the two men killed the victim. The population was 1,143 at the 2010 census. John Paul Stevens: Those mentally retarded persons who meet the law's requirements for criminal responsibility should be tried and punished when they commit crime. Atkins v. Virginia Case Brief - Rule of Law: Under the Eighth Amendment, the capital punishment of a mentally retarded convict is cruel and unusual. In the penalty stage, a forensic psychologist who had evaluated Atkins before trial concluded that he was “mildly mentally retarded”. Audio Transcription for Opinion Announcement - June 20, 2002 in Atkins v. Virginia William H. Rehnquist: The opinion of the Court in No. In Atkins v. Virginia , the Court held that the nation’s standards of decency had evolved to the point where no such executions should occur. 536 U.S. 304 (2002) Facts and Procedural History: Petitioner was convicted of abduction, armed robbery, and capital murder.