In particular, this post explores the historical backdrop that should inform any discussion of the many habeas corpus issues raised in ACLU v. Mattis as well as the Supreme Court’s earlier 2004 decision in Hamdi v. Rumsfeld. The Government deemed Hamdi an “enemy combatant,” which justified holding Hamdi indefinitely and without formal charges or proceedings. 337 F.3d 335 (4th Cir. Resources Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, The Oyez Project Activity The Afghan security team captured Yaser Hamdi and turned him […] yaser esam hamdi and esam fouad hamdi, as next friend of yaser esam hamdi, petition-ers v. donald h. rumsfeld, secretary of defense, et al. Hamdi v. Rumsfeld (2004) Majority Opinion. Yaser Esam Hamdi, born a U.S. citizen, was detained in Afghanistan by U.S. troops. 2002) [hereinafter Hamdi II]. on writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fourth circuit [june 28, 2004] Hamdi v. Rumsfeld. Hamdi v. Rumsfeld (2004) Summary Ten years ago, the Supreme Court ruled on a case involving enemy combatants, Hamdi v. Rumsfeld (2004). It also gave the U.S. ability to challenge their enemy during combat through an impartial authority. It was inclusive the U.S citizens though the rights of due process should be considered for its citizens. 03-6696, Hamdi versus Rumsfeld will be announced by Justice O’Connor. Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 296 F.3d 278 (4th Cir. Audio Transcription for Opinion Announcement - June 28, 2004 in Hamdi v. Rumsfeld William H. Rehnquist: The opinion of the Court in No. The U.S. Government contended that Hamdi had taken up arms for the Taliban, and against the U.S. Audio Transcription for Opinion Announcement - June 28, 2004 in Hamdi v. Rumsfeld Sandra Day O'Connor: Aside from unspecified screening processes in military interrogations in which the government suggest Hamdi could have told his side of the story, Hamdi has received no process to date. Yaser Hamdi v. Donald Rumsfeld Civil No. 02-439 Chronology of the Litigation Litigation involving Yaser Hamdi has included three separate cases, five decisions by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, and a ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court. United States Supreme Court 542 U.S. 507 (2004) Facts. Sandra Day O'Connor: This case comes here on certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. In this eLesson, students will explore this landmark case on the rights of the accused. It is a U.S Supreme Court case that established the authority of U.S government ability to detain an enemy during combat. Justice O’Connor announced the judgment of the Court and delivered an opinion, in which The Chief Justice, Justice Kennedy, and Justice Breyer join. The Fourth Circuit denied rehearing en banc, with several written dissents. Hamdi V. Rumsfeld (542 U.S. 507) is a United States Supreme Court case involving Yaser Esam Hamdi, an American born citizen captured in Afghanistan in 2001 by Afghani militants and turned over to U.S. forces during the initial American invasion or Iraq and Afghanistan. He was held by the United States in detention, indefinitely, for the duration of his trial.